MGNREGA vital, Rajasthan villages say ‘no’ to municipal upgrade

MGNREGA vital, Rajasthan villages say ‘no’ to municipal upgrade

MGNREGA vital, Rajasthan villages say ‘no’ to municipal upgrade

Even as officials sing paeans to planned development, villagers are more concerned about the loss of benefits from around two dozen rural schemes  

Hanumangarh/Jaisalmer, Rajasthan: When the Rajasthan government announced in its Budget on February 10 last year that many village panchayats will be converted into municipalities, villagers of Goluwala Niwadan and Goluwala Sihagan did not know what was coming. As soon as the notification was issued on June 26, work under Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) scheme stopped at Goluwala Niwadan and Goluwala Sihagan in Hanumangarh district.

"We workers have nothing to do with the municipal status. All we need is employment, which we get from MGNREGA. As soon as the notification was issued, MGNREGA work was stopped," says MGNREGA mate Kamal Chhimpa (58).

MGNREGA workers working in Ramdevra (Photo - Rajender Soni)

Angered by the loss of person-days of over 3,000 workers, the residents of both villages protested before deputy tehsildar of Goluwala, sub-divisional magistrate of Pilibanga and Hanumangarh District Collectorate for two months. However, when the government did not pay attention to their demand and opened a municipality office at Goluwala Niwadan, villagers Pradeep Bishnoi and Rohitash Sharma approached the Rajasthan High Court (HC) challenging the formation of the municipality.  

They argued that the government declared their panchayats as municipalities without following the procedure prescribed under Section 101 of the Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994. "Under Section 101, the district Collector should have issued an objection notice and invited objections from the villagers, but the villagers were not given an opportunity to be heard," Bishnoi (30), who has worked as an MGNREGA mate for many years, tells 101Reporters

Gram Panchayat Office Goluwala Sihagan (Photo - Balvindra Kharoliya)

In a huge relief to the villagers, the HC issued a stay order on July 25 last year. Further hearings will happen in due course. For now, both panchayats have started functioning as before.

Why exactly were they worried when work under the state government’s Indira Gandhi Urban Employment Guarantee Scheme was available in municipal areas? MGNREGA workers think it is not possible to get as much work under the urban scheme as is available under the rural scheme.

“MGNREGA is the most attractive among the government schemes from which people of the village benefit. Their livelihood mostly depends on it,” claims Krishnalal Pareek (58) from Goluwala Sihagan.

“I have worked in MNREGA for many years, so I know its benefits,” Bishnoi adds.

The protests were not restricted to Goluwala Niwadan and Goluwala Sihagan. Immediately after the government’s Budget announcement, the people of Jaisalmer’s Ramdevra village panchayat, located 445 km from Goluwala, launched their protest saying they will stop getting the benefits under various schemes if the conversion to municipality happened. Despite this, the notification to convert Ramdevra into a municipality was issued in April.

Soon after, sarpanch Samandar Singh Tanwar filed a writ petition in the High Court, which stayed the process. “Ramdevra has over 3,000 MGNREGA workers. They feared they would become unemployed if MGNREGA work ceased,” Tanwar says, adding that they would have been deprived of about 24 schemes if the village status was lost.

MGNREGA mate Jagdish Baral (35) of Mawa in Ramdevra used to work as a construction worker before turning into MGNREGA labourer. “I have been a mate for many years now. No doubt, MGNREGA has a huge contribution in maintaining the livelihood of my family,” he says.

Ramdevra-based MGNREGA worker Dhannaram Panwar (34) says there would be no benefit for workers like him if Ramdevra became a municipality. “The poor get employment only in panchayats,” he says convincingly.

Tanwar adds that villagers would also have to pay a higher rate of house tax to the municipality. Small shopkeepers will have to obtain trade licences. Urban development tax will also need to be paid by all. People will have to bear the burden of higher land regulation.

Group of MGNREGA workers protesting (Photo - Balvindra Kharoliya)

According to government officials, this notification was a symbol of progress towards urbanisation of villages, but the villagers did not like it. 

Pawan Chaudhary, who was the executive officer of Goluwala municipality for a week, enumerates the benefits of forming a municipality. “The villagers may face some problems initially when the panchayat becomes a municipality, but ultimately it is in their benefit. Formation of a municipality will lead to planned development. Due to urbanisation, the market will develop and facilities such as roads, streetlights, sanitation and parks will be available.”

“This will increase the property value. People will get commercial leases for their lands through which they will be able to access bank loans. Employment opportunities will increase as industries will develop in the surrounding areas. Colonies will develop on agricultural lands,” Chaudhary, currently the executive officer of Suratgarh Municipality in Sriganganagar district, tells 101Reporters.

Choudhary says he had educated villagers about these benefits, but villagers were more inclined towards benefits of panchayat schemes. “MGNREGA was also a big issue,” he adds.

Sushil Siddh, acting village development officer, Goluwala Niwadan, tells 101Reporters that there are about 2,500 job cards in Goluwala Niwadan and Goluwala Sihagan panchayats. “MGNREGA workers have opposed the formation of the municipality the most. Even if there is an urban employment scheme, the villagers know that they cannot get work as compared to MGNREGA,” he says.

Professor Kulbhushan Kothari (89), a former senior adviser of UNICEF and managing trustee of NGO Pratham Rajasthan, tells 101Reporters that the apprehensions of the villagers were justified because the poor have not been given any importance in the framework of urban planning. "The infrastructure of schemes made for rural areas is more effective from the point of view of the poor. In cities, the development of wards is directly decided by the government, whereas ward sabha exists in villages. Village panchayat is a constitutional body, and municipalities are less powerful than village panchayats," he notes.

Prof Kothari says villagers are not wrong if they trust MGNREGA because no one knows how long the Indira Gandhi Urban Employment Guarantee Scheme will lastthough the newly-formed BJP government of the state has made a provision for this scheme in the Budget. However, its future is at stake as the BJP government is examining whether to continue this scheme and the Chief Minister Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme.

Prof Kothari says that merely removing the village panchayat board from any building and hanging the board with the name of municipality written on it will not lead to development. For this, proper planning will have to be done. "The most important thing is to let the village remain a village. For good results, the resources available in rural areas should be utilised by forming collectives of 10 or 20 villages. A federation of villages will have to be formed on the lines of Amul," he envisages.

The HC's stay order is still in effect in Goluwala and Ramdevra. With the government change, it is possible that the new BJP government may change the decision of the previous government and allow village panchayats to remain as such. If not, the legal battle may drag on for a long time.

Edited by Rekha Pulinnoli

Cover Photo - MGNREGA workers protesting against making Gram Panchayat a municipality in Goluwala (Photo - Balvindra Kharoliya)


101 Stories Around The Web

Explore All News

Write For 101Reporters

Follow Us On