Telangana polls: 2.2 million voters could not cast their ballots; citizens heap criticism on govt via social media

Telangana polls: 2.2 million voters could not cast their ballots; citizens heap criticism on govt via social media

Telangana polls: 2.2 million voters could not cast their ballots; citizens heap criticism on govt via social media

Telangana’s missing voters

 

The weekend following polling day in Telangana, parties were already offering and rejecting alliances; exit polls largely predicting a sweep for the incumbent Telangana Rashtra Samithi, some leaning towards a hung verdict. But what none of the political leaders were talking about was the apparent large-scale deletion of voters from the electoral rolls. According to activists, at least 8%, or 22 lakhs, of the 2.8 crore voters in the state missed out on exercising their franchise due to a faulty voter deletion exercise way back in 2015. On Twitter and other social media platforms, users expressed their discontent with #WhereisMyVote, led by Olympic badminton player, Jwala Gutta.

On December 7, reports continued to pour in, especially from Hyderabad of voters who arrived at their respective polling stations to ultimately not find their names on the voters list. Banumurthy from Nampally said while he got his voting slip, his wife who has her EPIC, was unable to vote. They had tried earlier at another polling booth nearby before returning home disappointed. “Two anganwadi workers came home and had given the original EPIC for my wife and a voting slip for me. First, we had gone to Tulsi school where we were told to come here. Here I have a vote but my wife doesn’t. We don’t understand how many places we have to go for a vote. Why is this government doing this?”

Mr Prasad Mandala said that despite the government making a sincere effort to educate people this time by conducting mock sessions in various constituencies, he saw many people in his polling station at St Anne’s school in Nampally going back without casting their vote after not being able to find their names. Sharada Sanghi, a 78-year-old voter who had come to that booth wasn’t able to vote as she didn’t get the voter’s slip despite having voted here many times in the past.

Protests had broken out in front of the Mandal Revenue Office in Kamareddy town on polling day. “Almost 10-20% of the votes are missing and it is not a small thing to elect a candidate when the number is so large. We demand a remedy for this and we will fight to get back our right to vote,” said a youth who is one among many who are protesting in front of MRO office in Kamareddy town on polling day. In Pitlam village from the same district, an enraged voter demands, "I have all the documents necessary to vote. Why don't I get my right to vote? Am I dead? I demand my right."

In March 2015, the Election Commission of India undertook the National Electoral Roll Purification and Authentication Programme (NERPAP) that would link Aadhaar with Electoral Photo ID Card (EPIC) to identify and delete bogus and duplicate voters. The algorithm used had a failure rate as high as 93%, as revealed during the pilot phase in Bihar the same year. Within five months, the Supreme Court had ordered that Aadhaar can’t be used for anything other than the Public Distribution System (PDS). But by then, 31 crore IDs were already linked; the Telangana State Election Commission had deleted 27 lakh voters from the rolls already, according to a Newsminute report, disproportionately affecting voters in the constituencies under Greater Hyderabad. Reportedly, 98% of the NERPAP was completed in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh. Over 12 lakh new voters were added to the electoral rolls here this time, but it is not clear how many of them are first-time voters and how many are those who reapplied after their names had be deleted.

The same report also says the follow up to deletion to was not done as per ECI norm which says when an Electoral Registration Officer intends to delete a voter, there must be “a reasonable opportunity to the voter who is being deleted by sending notices to the voter along with form-6, a document meant to reapply for deleted the voter ID”. These notices are meant to be delivered by Booth Level Officers who are also supposed to visit the voter if they decide to reapply and collect the required forms. The report quotes a senior Congress leader claiming he stumbled onto to thousands of undelivered notices in just one ward office of the Greater Hyderabad Metropolitan Corporation.

The Chief Electoral Officer called a press conference Friday evening to address these concerns. "Missing of votes has been a major complaint. It is a mistake that has happened and it needs to be rectified. it is a problem and it has to be seriously addressed. Special summary revision will be taken up with effect for 1st January publication, through which we will go to the parliamentary elections. Those who have denied fairly, I apologise to them. Many people have called me personally if something can be done but couldn't do any this time. next time we will take a special care on this issue.”

"We have 20 votes in our family but this time we have got only two votes. We have voted many times in the past in one of the three polling booths nearby, but this time we didn’t find our names in any of the booths. I have been trying to find my name from 8'o clock in the morning but couldn't vote," said a frustrated Paramesh after close to polls as he held his voting slip at Viveka Vardhini University polling station in Hyderabad's Goshamahal constituency.

Prasanna S, a litigation lawyer who has been pursuing the case voter deletions through Aadhaar linkage, tweeted on Satuday that it was “clear that the process that the Election Commission had used to purge voters from the electoral rolls is grossly flawed and is perceived to have no integrity whatsoever”. He said the EC should publish the constituency-wise deletion numbers before the announcement of final results on December 11 for the public to be able to judge whether the election outcome has been “materially” affected. According to him, comparing the number of purges in a constituency and the winning margin will be able to clearly establish if a case can be made for challenging the election at that constituency under Section 100(1)(d) of the Representation of People Act, 1951.  

 

Would you like to Support us

Politics
Health
Conflict

101 Stories Around The Web

Explore All News

Write For 101Reporters

Would you like to Support us

Follow Us On