Armstrong Chanambam | Feb 26, 2019 | 6 min read
A
week ago, Veewon Thokchom, ex-president of Manipur Students’ Association Delhi
(MSAD), did not know if he would see his family again — he was picked up from
his rented home in the national capital last Thursday by eight plain-clothed men,
who had no ID or arrest warrant to show his family members; it was only after
his brother lodged a missing person complaint at the local police station that they
found out that the student activist had been arrested on the charge of sedition,
but allegedly without the authorities following due procedure.
Thokchom,
who has been extremely vocal about his criticism of the government over its
move to enact the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2016, had reportedly been
arrested over a Facebook post he had shared during the height of protests in
the Northeast against the contentious law.
Now
out on bail, he spoke to Armstrong Chanambam about the Bill, Northeast, and
racism. Edited excerpts:
Word has it that
during your stint as MSAD president the association mediated to resolve the
months-long deadlock between Manipur University and the state government, which
saw the arrest of many students and professors. How much of it is true and what
was your role in it?
MSAD
didn’t mediate... We simply resisted the Hindutva politics infiltrating the
university; we saw Professor A P Pandey, the vice-chancellor, as the reason
behind the university’s systemic saffronisation. Our focus was on resisting
these saffron forces, not just on removing an unpopular V-C. That episode gave
us solid ground for the kind of resistance we needed to save the university.
Beginning with the arrest of several students demanding the removal of Manipur University's V-C, the Manipur government, in last one year, either detained or arrested many youth. Do you know why?
BJP’s
ideology is to openly claim that a Hindu Rashtra is its main political project.
The state government’s foundation is weak — it was formed with the support of
an independent MLA and smaller parties like the NPP and others; that makes it
insecure whenever there is any protest... It is not about arresting but
creating a fear psychosis, so that those wanting to protest remain intimidated
and silent. Also, CM N Biren’s government here is only collaborating with the
Centre — everything happening in Manipur is known in Delhi — so we can’t
completely blame the state. It’s up to the government to engage in a dialogue
and show that it’s pro-people and pro-students.
You’ve also
raised your voice against the arbitrary detention of TV journalist Kishorechandra
Wangkhem under the National Security Act (NSA). Why do you think he’s still
detained?
Because
the Act itself is such! Representing MSAD, I had argued that we have to look at
his detention along with the response from the people of Manipur, because only
a few responded. In fact, we were the only student union in Manipur and Delhi
that actually protested his arrest. The reason is Manipuris have been living
under the terrifying AFSPA (Armed Forces [Special Powers] Act); so for them,
NSA, in comparison, is nothing. The latter’s implications are yet to register
in their minds. Also, Kishorechandra is in jail for saying something on
Facebook; so, naturally, people are afraid to voice their opinion.
What prompted
you to bring members of various students’ organisations all the way from
Manipur, to organise a protest against the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, right
in front of Parliament?
First
of all, to clarify, I didn’t bring them; they had planned to come to Delhi.
MSAD, as an organisation based in the national capital, took responsibility. We
have been collaborating with progressive forces, barring political parties and
including civil society organisations and students’ unions. They had planned a
protest in Delhi, and we played host. As we know the ground reality and the
kind of protests needed in Delhi, we only shared our ideas on what ought to be
done and what not. In a first, we burnt effigies of the PM and Home minister.
From then on, everyone became really worried about the kind of protest we would
organise next. The Bill, which seeks to change the definition of illegal
migrants, is terrifying... Everyone has seen the events unfolding in Tripura. It’s
not like you wake up one day and find that everyone in your state is an
outsider. It’s a gradual process, like slow poisoning. It’s not about
population invasion; it’s about politics, economy, culture, religion, etc. If
India is so concerned about persecuted minorities around the world or in
neighbouring nations, then why leave out the Rohingyas? Everyone is rushing to
take credit for the Bill in Parliament... Congress will get votes in the name
of secularism and BJP will get vote banks, to which it will say it brought the
Bill and, if elected, will do more. Even if the Congress comes to power at the
Centre, this thing will come up again… We cannot blame the BJP alone. So, we
have to remain vigilant.
Are you
apprehensive about the Bill’s passing, considering BJP president Amit Shah
pledged to do just that if his party is re-elected?
If
the BJP does do that, we will resist. We have been fighting against every form
of injustice in Manipur for many decades. Manipuris, for sure, won’t stay
silent if such a thing comes to pass. Also, it will be a huge mistake on Centre’s
part... If the government considers us as Indians, it should show that through its
actions, not by discriminating against a section of the population through such
laws or Acts.
What will you do
if the Bill is passed?
Right
now, I don’t know… if and when the time comes, the people of Manipur will
decide as one. We must go by that collective voice, not by what I want or MSAD
wants.
You are preparing
for your UGC-NET and for admission into an MPhil programme. What do you aspire
to be?
I
want to be in academia, so that I can give ideas to people. I also want to be
an activist, but not to do politics around the university or sit inside seminar
rooms — that isn’t the right way to bring about change; I will go out and talk
to people.
Is your
opposition to the Bill conditioned by your bitter personal experiences with
racism and the sense of alienation you feel in your own country?
No;
had that been the case, people who have lived only in Manipur all their lives
wouldn’t be resisting. I have studied in different parts of the country; they
haven’t seen the verbal and physical racism I have experienced. So, opposing the
Bill has nothing to do with racism. But having said that, India as a nation has
to have a vibrant discourse on racism, because there are 45 million Mongoloid
people in this country. So, there’s a clear racial divide… If you look closely,
there are all these specific policies and arrangements for people who look
different; for example, Centre itself has a lot of policies only for the
Northeast. I think this is where racism starts.
More stories published under
Conflict